Marc Forster needs to go back to film school.
Living where I do, I don't get out to movies all that often. Making it on opening night is even more rare. But after Casino Royale invigorated a franchise that I loved for years--bus has been in a decades-long slump, with lousy Bonds and stupid stories and a sad over-reliance on one-liners and gadgets, I had high hopes for Quantum of Solace.
Daniel Craig, despite my initial misgivings, is a great Bond. And he looks cooler in a black shirt and sunglasses than anyone since Steve McQueen.
But he couldn't save this mess.
Forster, the director, takes a bad recent trend to a ridiculous extreme. His fight scenes and chase scenes (which together comprise about 80% of the movie) are all quick cuts and close-ups. The idea (speaking as an ex-film major with at least some historical and technical perspective on this) is to make the viewer feel like he or she is immersed in the action, because if you were fighting a Bond baddie, that's what you'd be seeing.
But we're not Bond and we're not IN the action. We're supposed to be watching the action and concerned for the characters that we like. Unless the whole movie was shot from Bond's POV (which would be unwatchable), forcing us into the middle of those action sequences only calls attention to itself as an artifice, and yanks us out of the story. Yes, I tensed up at those moments--but only because I could tell, as soon as one of those scenes started to unfold, that I was in for another several minutes of bad filmmaking.
If Forster wants to learn how to stage and shoot a close-quarter fight scene that's effective, that makes the viewer feel the desperate tension of the characters and experience the violence of the moment, he should go back and watch Roy Scheider's hotel room fight in Marathon Man--or even Sean Connery's face-off against Rosa Klebb in From Russia With Love. Those are fights that hold up today. Quantum of Solace's are fights that will make me NOT buy the DVD.
The story is pretty awful, but that might largely be because with only 20% of the movie's screen time to play out, it never really went anywhere. And if you haven't watched Casino Royale recently, or memorized it, you'll be even more lost, because Bond's every action in this film is a response to that one.
It's sad to see a once-great franchise brought back from the brink, only to be dangled over the edge again. With any luck, the next movie will be be better written and much better directed. As it is, I wish this one had starred Pierce Brosnan or Timothy Dalton, so I would feel better about never watching it again.